Arunkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18148 of 2018 1.ARUNKUMAR 2.RAJAKUMARAN 3.BABY SAROJA 4.ANUSHIYA 5.SARJAN 6.JEBARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.45 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) 406, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.45 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was harassed by the first petitioner on the instigation of the other petitioners for want of further dowry. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is a case of case in counter. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Nagercoil and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2 to 6 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed as against the petitioners.

sd/- 10/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, NAGERCOIL.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN, Advocate, SR.No.19367.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18148 of 2018 Date :10/10/2018 RAM/RR/SAR 4/15.10.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/