← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10449/2026dismissed

Rani v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2026-06-23Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Rani

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District (Crime No. 652 of 2023 )

...Respondent

For Petitioner : Mr.K.N.Thambi for Mr.G.Cenil For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.652 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

2/6

The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.12.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii) (c) of NDPS Act in Crime No. 652 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 60 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case..

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent police has registered a false case against the petitioner and she is not involved in any such activities as alleged by the respondent police. He would further submit that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.12.2023. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 60kgs of ganja which is a commercial quantity. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 3/6

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and that the contraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and already this Court has dismissed the bail petition filed by the petitioner and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the present petition for bail and though the petitioner raised medical grounds as per the report of the jail authorities at present no need for surgery and now the petitioner is symptoms free and taking her regular hypetensive medications and doing her routine activities inside the prison campus hence this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Hence the petition stands dismissed.

(P D B J) 23.06.2026 aav 4/6

To The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 10449 of 2026 Date : 23.06.2026 6/6