M.Rajaram v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13864 of 2021 1.M.Rajaram 2.M.Raguvel @ Raguram ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirupuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

Crime No.181 of 2019 2.Vigneshwaran 3.Ayyambose ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in S.C.No.105 of 2019 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Maanamadurai, Sivagangai District and quash the same as far as the petitioners are concerned.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian For R1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (crl. Side) For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Arunkumar

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking quashment of S.C.No.105 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Maanamadurai, Sivagangai District. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based upon the complaint given by the 2nd respondent herein, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.181 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 307 of IPC against the petitioners.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3 and also by their respective counsels.

1/3

4.The petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3 appeared through video conference from the Office of the Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in S.C.No.105 of 2019 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Maanamadurai, Sivagangai District is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in S.C.No.105 of 2019, pending on the file of the Sub Court, Maanamadurai, Sivagangai District is hereby quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To Enclose copy of Joint Compromise Memo.

1.The Sub Judge, Maanamadurai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirupuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

2/3

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.R.L.DHILIPAN PANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-33270[F] dated 29/10/2021 ) 28.10.2021 RK/SKN(23/11/2021) 3P 5C 3/3