Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9563/2017disposed of

B.Thualsi Mani, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-05-24Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.(MD)No.9563 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.7295 of 2017 B.Thulasi Mani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Gugiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.K.Manikam, ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband namely S.Balasubramanian S/o Santhanam and his family members and consequently direct the respondents no.1 and 2 to forbear the respondent no.3 and their henchmen from anyway interfering with my peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.T.R.Janarthanan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents nos. 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband namely S.Balasubramanian S/o Santhanam and his family members and consequently direct the respondents no.1 and 2 to forbear the respondent no.3 and their henchmen from anyway interfering with my peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner. 2.The learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. In view of the order to be passed in this petition, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.05.2017, is directed to be disposed of, by the respondents 1 and 2, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.05.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner as well as the other interested persons, if any.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Vacation Officer /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Gugiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

+1cc to M/s. T.LAJAPATHIROY Advocate in SR. NO.57250 MRN JS/JC/SAR.3/01.06.2017/2P-4C W.P.(MD)No.9563 of 2017 24.05.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/