Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9595/2017disposed of

Sithi Junaitha(Aged About 24 v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-05-24Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.(MD)No.9595 of 2017 Sithi Junaitha ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to issue look out circular against Ajas Ahmed, who is 1st accused in Crime No.11 of 2016 pending on the file of the second respondent by considering her representation dated 27.01.2017 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Janarthanan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to issue look out circular against Ajas Ahmed, who is 1st accused in Crime No.11 of 2016 pending on the file of the second respondent by considering her representation dated 27.01.2017 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. 2.The learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3.At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.01.2017, is directed to be disposed of, by the respondents 1 and 2, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.01.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner as well as the other interested persons, if any.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar() /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

+1cc to M/S. R.GANDHI, Advocate, SR.No.57270. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.57809 W.P.(MD)No.9595 of 2017 24.05.2017 SDS/SV/SAR 4/31.05.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/