N.Kadarmeera, v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.(MD)No.9618 of 2017 N.Kadarmeera ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2. The Tahsildar, Marungapuri Taluk Office, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2017 to measure his lands to an extent of 72.50 hectares in S.F.No.256/4, an extent of 7.50 hectares in S.F.No.256/2B, an extent of 21.00 hectares in S.F.No.232/1, and extent of 83.50 hectares in S.F.No.233/1, an extent of 2.57.00 hectares in S.F.No.253/2C, an extent of 2.78.00 hectares in S.F.No.256/3B, an extent of 66.50 hectares in S.F.No.231/2A and an extent of 09.00 hectares in S.F.No.256/5 of Thuvarankurichi Revenue Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District and lay boundaries stones as per revenue records.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.N.Ramanathan For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Janarthanan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2017 to measure his lands to an extent of 72.50 hectares in S.F.No.256/4, an extent of 7.50 hectares in S.F.No.256/2B, an extent of 21.00 hectares in S.F.No.232/1, and extent of 83.50 hectares in S.F.No.233/1, an extent of 2.57.00 hectares in S.F.No.253/2C, an extent of 2.78.00 hectares in S.F.No.256/3B, an extent of 66.50 hectares in S.F.No.231/2A and an extent of 09.00 hectares in S.F.No.256/5 of Thuvarankurichi Revenue Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District and lay boundaries stones as per revenue records.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3.At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.04.2017, is directed to be disposed of, by the respondents 1 and 2, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.04.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner as well as the other interested persons, if any.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Vacation Officer /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2. The Tahsildar, Marungapuri Taluk Office, Trichy District.

+1 CC to Mr.A.N.RAMANATHAN, Advocate, SR No. 57317 +1 CC to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR No. 57807 MRN PSM/KP/SAR4/30.05.2017/2P/5C W.P.(MD)No.9618 of 2017 24.05.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/