← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20377/2016disposed of

Suresh, S/O.Madhusoodhanan v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2016-10-21Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.10.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P(MD)No.20377 of 2016 Suresh

...Petitioner

vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant permission and protection for children Cultural Program scheduled to be held on 29.10.2016 at 07.00 a.m., to 08.00 p.m., in connection with "Deepavali Festival" at Meenakshi Nagar, Irulappapuram, Kottar Post, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.10.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss Government Advocate

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant permission and protection for children Cultural Program scheduled to be held on 29.10.2016 at 07.00 a.m., to 08.00 p.m., in connection with "Deepavali Festival" at Meenakshi Nagar, Irulappapuram, Kottar Post, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.10.2016. 2.Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3.The learned Government Advocate would submit that a proceedings under Section 107 of Cr.P.C., has been initiated against the petitioners' party as well as opposite party based on the complaint of the second respondent.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C., was already closed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 10.08.2016. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent and also perused the materials on record.

6. Though the petitioner has prayed for a relief of mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and protection for children cultural program scheduled to be held on 29.10.2016, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice to issue direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.10.2016.

7.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 10.10.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law on or before 26.10.2016.

8.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

+1cc to M/s.S.R.Anbarasu, Advocate in SR.62599 +1cc to the Special Government Pleader, in SR.62514 W.P(MD)No.20377 of 2016 21.10.2016 am.

PBK/GSV-PM/SAR-I 21/10/2016 ::2P-5C:(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/