Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9931/2017disposed of

Devi, v. The Director Of Government

2017-05-25Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.(MD)No.9931 of 2017 Devi ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director of Government of Examinations, Office of the Directorate of Government Examination, D.P.I Complex,College Road,Chennai-6.

2.The Head Mistress, Raniyar Government Girls HigherSecondary School, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to rectify the mistake that crept in the mark statement of the petitioner's daughter Subalakshmi with regard to her date of birth on the basis of the proposal submitted by the 2nd respondent dated 26.07.2016 in Na.Ka.No.275 of 2016 within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mrs.Bharathi Government Advocate

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to rectify the mistake that crept in the mark statement of the petitioner's daughter Subalakshmi with regard to her date of birth on the basis of the proposal submitted by the second respondent dated 26.07.2016 in Na.Ka.No.275 of 2016 within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court.

2. The learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is directed to be disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In view of the limited scope of the prayer sought for the by petitioner, without going into the merits of the matter, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation to the first respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of such representation, the first respondent is directed to consider her request, on merits and in accordance with law (in the light of the proposal sent by the second respondent) after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as the other parties concerned, if any, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks thereafter.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Vacation Officer /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director of Government of Examinations, Office of the Directorate of Government Examination, D.P.I Complex, College Road, Chennai-6.

2.The Head Mistress, Raniyar Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Pudukottai District.

+1cc to The Spl. Government pleader Sr.No.57753 +1cc to Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate Sr.No.57818 ns/ls/vsa vb/mms/sar4/01.06.2017/2p/5c W.P.(MD)No.9931 of 2017 25.05.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/