Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9951/2017disposed of

S.Karmegam v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-05-25Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD)No.9951 of 2017 S.Karmegam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendant of Police, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Wing, Madurai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to consider petitioner's representation dated 17.5.2017 and to take appropriate actions against accused persons

1) Boopathi S/o. Karuppannathevar,

2) M. Rajapandi S/o.

Muthirulathevar, Mushtakurichi, 3) Sub Registrar of Kallikudi, and 4) Document Writer I. Rathinam W/o. Inbaraj they were created bogus sale deed vide Document No. 302/2017 dated 09.03.2017 in the petitioners land comprised in survey No. 188/1 with an extent of 23.50 Ares.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents : Mr. G.Muthu kannan Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr. G.Muthu kannan, Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.

2. By consent of parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action against the accused persons for creating bogus sale deed vide Document No. 302/2017 dated 09.03.2017 in respect of the petitioner's land comprised in survey No.188/1 measuring an extent of 23.50 Ares. To that effect, he has already made a representation on 17.05.2017, which, according to the petitioner, has not been considered so far. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, this Court only directs the first respondent to consider the above representation of the petitioner and pass orders on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, also after hearing the petitioner and any other contesting respondents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. It is made clear that contempt will not lie on failure of the 2nd respondent to consider the representation within the time stipulated.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSIII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendant of Police, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Wing, Madurai District.

+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.57766 +One cc to Mr.R.Sundar, Advocate, SR.NO.57461 gsp/sj RL/5C/2P/MR/SAR2/1.6.2017 W.P.(MD)No.9951 of 2017 25.05.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/