Syed Ibrahim v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Syed Ibrahim ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Sivagangai District.
In Crime No. 02 of 2026..
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Anand R.
For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 02 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as amended by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment Act), 2018 in Crime No. 2 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.05.2026 at about 09.15 hours, the petitioner, who is a Public Servant was caught redhanded while receiving illegal gratification of Rs.1 lakh from the defacto complainant for releasing the final amount relating to Government Road strengthening and widening works executed through EKS Constructions. Hence the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial 2/6
custody on 11.05.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the case has been registered against the accused persons. Though the petitioner has no previous cases, considering the nature of offence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6.Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offence and the fact that the alleged occurrence borne out of records, thereby, there is no chance for tampering the evidence and further considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous cases to his credit, as well as the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 3/6
[a] Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
4/6
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
(P D B J) 09.06.2026 PNM TO
1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai
2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai District.
3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai.
4. The Inspector of Police,, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Sivagangai District.
5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
P. DHANABAL,J PNM
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10541 of 2026 Date : 09/06/2026 6/6