Esakkimuthu v. The Superintendent Of Police

W.P.(MD)No.16970 of 2021 and BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.16970 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.13898 & 13901 of 2021 Esakkimuthu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thirukkurungudi, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in C.No.C2/22303/2018 dated 30.04.2018 and to quash the same and subsequently directing respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet No.221/2014 on the file of the third respondent police station by considering the petitioner's representation dated 31.08.2021 within time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Syed Ali For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner's name has been figuring in the History Sheet list maintained by the third respondent. The petitioner states that after 2018, he has not come under the adverse notice of the respondents.

3. Since for more than two years the petitioner has not come under the adverse notice, the respondents are directed to delete the name of the petitioner in the History Sheet. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.16970 of 2021 and

4. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PMU Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thirukkurungudi, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.N.SYED ALI, Advocate ( SR-1153[F] dated 11/01/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.16970 of 2021 07.01.2022 AP (20.01.2022) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2