← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14008/2022granted

Akilan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-08-12Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Dated: 12/08/2022 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN 1.Akilan 2.Vaseekaran 3.Saminathan 4.Chandra 5.Vivega 6.Keerthiga Devi 7.Shanthini

...Petitioners/Acuused Nos.4,7, 10,11,

12,14 and 15 Vs.

State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, S.S.Kottai, Sivagangai District.

(In Crime No.42 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ramasamy,Advocate For Respondent : Mr.Thanga Pandian Government Advocate(Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C.C PRAYER:- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.42 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

COMMON ORDER : The Court made the following order:- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A4, A7, A10, A11, A12, A14 and A15 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 355 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.42 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The petitioners are facing the charges for the offences under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 355 and 506(ii) IPC. 1/3

3.Seeking anticipatory bail, the petitioners are before this court.

4.Heard both sides.

5.Even though the allegations are serious nature, the accused assaulted the Panchayat President, who was also present in the place of occurrence, while eviction process was undertaken by the revenue officials, thinking that the de-facto complainant is responsible for the above said eviction process, these persons alleged to have made damage to the vehicle. But however, the identity of the persons involved in the occurrence is a matter for investigation. In this case, similarly placed person like that of the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail by the Principal District Judge, Sivagangai. So the petitioners, who are also standing on the very same footing are also entitled for anticipatory bail. 6.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this court in inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sivagangai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail will stand dismissed. sd/- 12/08/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SIVAGANGAI.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

2/3

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.KOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.RAMASAMY, Advocate ( SR-8514[I] dated 12/08/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14008 of 2022 Date :12/08/2022 er PKP/SVR/SAR-2/20.09.2022/3P/6C 3/3