Rajeswari v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rajeswari ... Petitioner versus 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take necessary action based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.05.2025 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this court with a grievance that the respondent police have not conducted investigation on her complaint. 2.When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the complaint of the petitioner was registered in CSR No.493 of 2025, enquiry was conducted and the complaint was closed as civil in nature. 3.Recording the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police shall furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner. 25.06.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 25.06.2025 4/4