A.Syed Abuthahir v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18644 of 2018 1 A.SYED ABUTHAHIR 2 A.SAKKARAI KANI 3 A.RAHMAD BEEVI 4 A.AYISHA BEEVI ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1,2,5 & 7 (MENTIONED AS AYESHA IN THE FIR) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

CRIME NO.15 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: Mr.AN.RAMANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 294(b), 147, 506(i) I.P.C and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.15 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner married the defacto complainant and there was no cordial relationship between them. Thereafter, the defacto complainant left the matrimonial home and in order to harass the petitioners, gave a false complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the third and fourth petitioners and the investigation is pending. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 1 & 2 with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners 1 & 2 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 & 2 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners 1 & 2 shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners 1 & 2 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 30/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.AN.RAMANATHAN Advocate SR.No.20718

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18644 of 2018 Date :30/10/2018 MS/VR-MMS/SAR-2/01.11.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/