Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20719/2016disposed of

M.M.Manoharan v. The Inspector General Of

2016-10-26Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.10.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition (MD) No.20719 of 2016 M.M.Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome Road, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, District Registrar Office, Palace Road, Madurai 625 001.

3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Palani.

4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Chathrapatti, Palani.

5.M.M.Sambath Kumar 6.T.Muthusamy ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to cancel the bogus lease deed registered as document No.2344/2015 on the file of the Office of the 4th Respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pandiarajan For Respondents 1-4 : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to cancel the bogus lease deed registered as document No.2344/2015 on the file of the fourth respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Heard Mr.G.Pandiarajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondent 1 to 4. Since this Court is not going to pass any adverse order against the respondents 5 and 6, notice to the respondents 5 and 5 is dispensed with. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 3.It is represented that the third respondent has already passed an order dated 10.06.2016 in Na.Ka.No.1093/A1/2016, rejecting the request of the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner has to challenge the said order before the appellate authority.

4.In such view of the matter, the petitioner cannot maintain this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the above said order passed by the third respondent, in the manner known to law, if he is so advised. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome Road,Chennai.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, District Registrar Office, Palace Road, Madurai 625 001.

3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office,Palani.

4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Chathrapatti, Palani.

+1cc to special Government Pleader SR.No.64726 sms sm:KM:18/11/2016:2P/6C Writ Petition (MD) No.20719 of 2016 26.10.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/