Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15536/2020allowed

Selva Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15536 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15536 of 2020 1.Selva Kumar 2.Mrs.Priya 3.Mrs.Padmini 4.Ramesh @ Kasiraman ... Petitioner/Accused Nos.1,3 to 5 vs.

1.State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Dindigul All Women Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.07 of 2016)

...Respondent/Complainant

2.Mrs.Naga Priya

...Respondent/Defacto

Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records and quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.508 of 2016, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul against the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.M.Aarumugam

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.508 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and quash the same. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.508 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.

3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(23.12.2020) and the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15536 of 2020 complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.508 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

EncL: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1)The Inspector of Police, Dindigul All Women Police Station, Dindigul District.

2)The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.

3) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dingigul.

4)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15536 of 2020 DATED : 23.12.2020 VB (08.01.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2