Ramasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15028 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15028 of 2020 Ramasamy ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 vs.

1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruparankundram, Madurai.

(Crime No.8 of 2014) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Jeyalakshmi ..2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings S.C.No.215 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai in connection with the Crime No.8 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gangai Amaran For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records pertaining to the proceedings in S.C.No.215 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai in connection with the Crime No.8 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioner/accused no.1 are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the Charge sheet in S.C.No.215 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today (17.12.2020) and the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15028 of 2020 complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the Charge sheet in S.C.No.215 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1)The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai.

2)The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruparankundram, Madurai.

3)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr. S.Veerapandiselvaraj, Advocate Sr.No.26576 ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15028 of 2020 DATED : 17.12.2020 VB (05.01.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2