Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15303/2020allowed

T.Muthupandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-21Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15303 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15303 of 2020 1.T.Muthupandi 2.T.Balamurugan ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 Vs.

1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Madurai District. ... 1st Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.124 of 2020) 2.R.Alagarsamy ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in crime No.124 of 2020 dated 26.03.2020 for the offence under Sections 294(b), 307, 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Thirumurugan For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.A.Kalidass

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in crime No.124 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the First Information Report in crime No.124 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15303 of 2020 present before this Court today(21.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise. The parties were also identified by the Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Madurai District. 4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the First Information Report in crime No.124 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Madurai District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Thirumurugan, Advocate Sr.No.26914 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15303 of 2020 21.12.2020 VB (08.01.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2