← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10621/2025dismissed

Velankani v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thallakulampr

2025-06-25Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/06/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Velankani, W/o.Baskar, ..Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.572 of 2025) .. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vijayaragavan Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.572 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : This Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS in Crime 1/3

No.572 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.05.2025, the defacto-complainant went to Alagar Festival, at that time, by using the crowded situation, this petitioner stolen 15 sovereign of gold Thali chain of the defacto-complainant. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide and conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 13.05.2025 nearly 43 days. Hence, he seeks bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on 11.05.2025, this petitioner by using crowded situation in the Alagar Festival stolen 15 sovereigns of gold Thali chain from the defacto-complainant. A melted gold was recovered from the petitioner. This petitioner is having three previous cases, all are similar in nature. If, the petitioner released on bail, she involved in more criminal activities. Hence, he strongly objected to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the manner in which the offence committed, this petitioner is having three previous cases, all are similar in nature, and considering the gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/3

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 25/06/2025 / TRUE COPY / /07/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

gvn TO:-

1. The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, SPECIAL PRISON FOR WOMEN, MADURAI.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10621 of 2025 Date :25/06/2025 MK/10.07.2025 3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3