Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2136/2016disposed of

D. Juliat Mallikabai v. The Director Of School

2016-03-02Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.02.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Writ Petition (MD) No.2136 of 2016 D.Juliat Mallikabai ... Petitioner Vs.

(*)1.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai 600 006.

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.

3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

4.J.Vedhamuthu Motchakan, Headmaster, Panchayat Union Elementary School Agraram, Alangulam Union, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents (*)(Cause title amended vide Court Order dated 17/03/2016 in WMP(MD)No.4244/2016 by PSNJ) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 12.11.2015 and 21.12.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar Government Advocate.

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 12.11.2015 and 21.12.2015.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar, learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.According to the petitioner, she is working as Elementary School Headmaster at Panchayat Union Elementary School, Kurunthanmozhi. She seeks transfer to Agaram Panchayat Union Elementary School. It is seen that the second respondent through his proceedings dated 13.10.2015 directed the third respondent to submit his report in this regard. Since the third respondent has not taken any steps to respond to the above said proceedings, the petitioner has made representation before the first respondent on 12.11.2015. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent has not passed any order on the representation made by her. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.

4.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.11.2015 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (*)Amended as per the order of this Court dated 17.03.2016 made in WMP(MD)No.4244/2016 in WP(MD)No.2136/2016 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To To be substituted the order already dispatched on 11.02.2016 (*)1.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai 600 006.

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

+1cc to Mr.V.Panneer Selvam,Advocate Sr.No.15572 sms AA/AAL-MPA/09.02.2016/2p-6c RG.AALMPA/SAR-I 23.03.2016 2P/5C Writ Petition (MD) No.2136 of 2016 01.02.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/