Veeraiyan v. The Inspector Ofpolice

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/08/2019 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM 1.Veeraiyan 2.Pirasath 3.Pannerselvam ... Petitioners/Accused 2 to 4 Vs State rep.by The Inspector Of police, Kallaperampur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

Crime No. 63 of 2019 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Muthumalai Raja, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 63 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed by the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4 seeking bail for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)Act, 1957, in Crime No.63 of 2019. 2.Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in the above case. He further submitted that the petitioners were arrested by the respondent police on 26.07.2019 and from that day onwards, they are in custody and hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioners.

1/3

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police has submitted that the petitioners have illegally transported one unit of river sand by bullock cart and hence, he strongly opposed this petition. However he fairly conceded that no previous case is pending against the petitioners. 5.Taking into consideration of the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioners and also the fact that the quantity of sand said to have been illegally transported is one unit and also the fact that the petitioners are in custody from 26.07.2019, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners by imposing conditions.

[a] the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Thanjavur District. [b] the petitioners shall report before the Respondent Police, daily at 10.30 A.M for a period of One Month and thereafter, as and when required for the interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 08/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO 2, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

2/3

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAPERAMPUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4.THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB JAIL PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

5.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.S.MUTHUMALAI RAJA Advocate SR.No.13124

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11167 of 2019 Date :08/08/2019 vsg TK/VR/SAR.1/08.08.2019/3P/7C 3/3