Boomi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruvegampet
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/06/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Boomi, S/o.Periyakaruppan,
...Petitioner/Accused No.3
Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvegampet Police Station, Sivagangai District.
(Crime No.100 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :
M/s.S.Malaikani Advocate.
For Respondent :
Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.100 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : This Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused No.3, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b) and 1/4
103(1) of BNS altered into Sections 126(2), 296(b), 103(1), 49, 61(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.100 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.05.2025 at about 7.40p.m. this petitioner and other accused persons have entered into criminal conspiracy and wrongfully restrained the deceased and abused him with filthy language and also committed murder of the deceased. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first accused himself had surrendered before the respondent police, based on his confession statement only, this petitioner was arrayed as one of the accused. This petitioner also voluntarily surrendered before the respondent police on 24.05.2025 The petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 25.05.2025 nearly 31 days. Hence, he seeks bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the first accused having love affair with the relative of the deceased. The deceased questioned the same and warned the first accused not to continue the relationship with his relative. The first petitioner keeping in the mind of the said act of the deceased. On 23.05.2025, the first accused and other accused persons were intercepted the two wheeler of the deceased Arun, and abused him in filthy 2/4
language and attacked him brutally with sickle. The deceased sustained severe injury all over his body, which leads profuse blood loss. He immediately taken to the hospital, later he died. It is a brutal murder case, the investigation is in preliminary stage. This petitioner is having one previous case. Hence, he objected to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that it is the case of murder, investigation is at preliminary stage, this petitioner is having one previous case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 26/06/2025 / TRUE COPY / /07/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
gvn TO 1 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVEGAMPET, THIRUVEGAMPET POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
3/4
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10648 of 2025 Date :26/06/2025 NBF/09.07.2025 4P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4