Beeshman @ Beeshmansubramani, v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Peraiyur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL S.Beeshman @ Beeshmansubramani

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station Madurai.

(Crime No. 39 of 2026 )

...Respondent

For Petitioner : M/s.G.Subiksha Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 39 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) @ 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 39 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on 13.02.2026 at about 10.00 a.m., the accused persons have taken the defacto complainant in a two wheeler in a separate place and assaulted and pushed him down and also kicked him in his private parts and also criminally intimdated him. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that coaccused were granted bail. Hence, he prayed to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

2/6

4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) @ 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 39 of 2026. He would further submit that the defacto complainant died after 30 days from the date of occurrence and the petitioner has no previous case. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and considering the facts that the alleged occurrence took place on 13.02.2026; however FIR has been registered only on 05.03.2026 and though the defacto complainant died after 30 days from the date of occurrence, so far no sections have been altered, and also the petitioner has no previous case, I 3/6

am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his/her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or 4/6

witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 17.06.2026 apd To 1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J apd

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11400 of 2026 Date : 17.06.2026 6/6