Prasanth @ Pirajaanth v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.Prasanth @ Prajaanth 2.Rampradeep 3.Ragul @ Raghulpandi ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs.

1.The State rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Palanichettypatti Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No.280 of 2023) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Marisamy ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in connection with Crime No.280 of 2023 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Palanichettypatti Police Station, Palanichettypatti, Theni District and consequently quash the same on the ground of compromise forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sankara Pandian For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr.V.Dinesh for R2 1/4

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.280 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.280 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC. 3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise.

2/4

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.280 of 2023 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police in respect of these petitioners. 6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.280 of 2023, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. 23.11.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No ta To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Palanichettypatti Police Station, Theni District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

ta 23.11.2023 4/4