Govindarasu @ Govindan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/12/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.14072 of 2020 Govindarasu @ Govindan ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virdhunagar District.
(Crime No.1201/2020). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.K.Gokul, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.1201/2020 on the file of respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.11.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) of IPC on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners/accused occupied the public places and constructed building in their village and when the defacto complainant condemned the attitude of the petitioners/accused there was a motive between them and on account of same on 06.11.2020 at about 12.30 pm., while the defacto complainant riding his two wheeler bearing Reg. No. TN 95 C 5583 the petitioners herein followed the defacto complainant behind his two wheeler in a Tata Indica Car bearing Reg. No.TN 72 AH 6315 with an intention to kill the defacto complainant scolded him in filthy language and knocked his two wheeler, due to which the defacto complainant sustained multiple injuries on his body. Hence the complaint.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and due to previous enmity a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He would also submit that the petitioner is in jail for more than 30 days,hence he may be granted bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and having 14 previous cases against him.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. In the result, the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 21/12/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUTHANGAL POLICE STATION, VIRDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, DINDIGUL.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14072 of 2020 Date :21/12/2020 AAV TE/JC/SAR-II : 23/12/2020 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/