← Library
Madras High CourtCMA(MD)/984/2018dismissed

The Deputy Director v. A.Seeni@ Seenivasan

2025-02-04Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10336 to 10338 of 2018 The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai.

... Appellant in all C.M.As.

-VsA.Seeni @ Seenivasan ... Respondent in C.M.A.(MD)No.984 of 2018 S.Vasuki ... Respondent in C.M.A.(MD)No.985 of 2018 S.Sugumari ... Respondent in C.M.A.(MD)No.986 of 2018 COMMON PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, praying this Court to set aside the common order dated 08.03.2018 made in FPA-PMLA-1545/CHN/2016, FPAPMLA-1548/CHN/2016 and FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016 on the file of the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act at New Delhi.

For Appellant : Mr.K.Govindarajan, Deputy Solicitor General of India For Respondent : Mr.R.Gandhi, Senior Counsel, for Mr.J.Karthikeyan (in all C.M.As.) COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent in all these appeals states that the prosecution under Prevention of Money Laundering Act does not survive, in view of the acquittal in the predicate schedule offence following the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vijay Madhanlal Choudhary Vs. Union of India and others reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 929. Therefore, the appeals have become infructuous. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[G.J., J.] & [R.P., J.] 04.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

AND R.POORNIMA , J.

Yuva 04.02.2025