Vinothkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Vinothkumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State, through The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.213 of 2023).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kannan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.213 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 392 of I.P.C, in Crime 213 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/3

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons snatched eight sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant and tried to ran away from the place of occurrence, however, when other came there to rescue, they left the chain and ran away. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and is no way connected in this case. Further, the petitioner is the friend of first accused. When both of them drove the two wheeler in the defacto complainant's street, questioned the petitioner, due to that wordy quarrel arose between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Hence, the false cae has been foisted against them.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner is having two previous cases, which are not in similar nature.

5. The earlier anticipatory bail application that was filed by this petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 19.06.2023, stating that there is five previous cases pending against the petitioner. The second anticipatory bail application has been moved by this petitioner, stating that no recovery has been made from this petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the gravity of offence and bad antecedent of the petitioner, he is not entitled for any 2/3

discretionary relief. Hence this anticipatory bail petition deserves dismissal and accordingly dismissed.

sd/- 11/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / /08/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12595 of 2023 Date :11/07/2023 SA/VR/SAR. /02.08.2023/3P/3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 3/3