← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14320/2018dismissed as infructuous

K.K.Ramesh v. The Government Of India,

2024-02-13Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar,Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.02.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR K.K.Ramesh ... Petitioner -vs1.The Government of India rep.by its Home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs North Block, New Delhi 2.The Government of India rep.by its Secretary Ministry of Road Transport and Highways New Delhi 3.The Government of Tamilnadu rep.by its Chief Secretary Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai 4.The Government of Tamilnadu rep.by its Home Secretary Fort St.George Secretariat, Chennai

5.The Government of Tamilnadu rep.by its Transport Secretary Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai 6.The Government of Tamilnadu rep.by its Principal Secretary Transport Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 7.The Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Street Chennai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to amend it as Rules in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to a.

to impose heavy fine amount above Rs.10,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/- to the Traffic violators.

b.

to confiscate the motor vehicles of the third time traffic violators. c.

to cancel the license of the motorist using cell phone while driving. d.

to make propaganda of Supreme Court and High Court guidelines in T.V.News papers and make advertisement by installing Digital Boards at Traffic signal junctions and Tasmac Bars. e.

by considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2018.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.K.Ramesh, Party-in-Person For Respondents :

Mr.S.Jeyasingh for R1 & R2 Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate for R3 to R7

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, submitted that in view of the subsequent development that the Central Government has amended the relevant Rules enhancing the fine amount as against the traffic violators, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

[D.K.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 13.02.2024 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No krk

To:

1.The Home Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi.

2.The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

3.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai.

4.The Home Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai.

5.The Transport Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai.

6.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

7.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Street, Chennai.

D.KRISHNAKUMAR , J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

krk 13.02.2024