Madras High CourtWP(MD)/23846/2016dismissed

A.Manickavasagam, v. The District Collector,

2017-03-09Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.03.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD) No.23846 of 2016 and WMP(MD)Mo.17169 and 17170 of 2016 A.Manickavasagam ... Petitioner -vs1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai-625 020.

2. The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Aringnar Anna Maaligai, Thallakulam, Madurai - 625 002.

3. The Member Secretary, Madurai Local Planning Authority, Aringnar Anna Maaligai, 3rd floor, Thallakulam, Madurai - 625 002.

4. The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Kappalur Industrial Estate, Madurai - 625 008.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, K.Pudur, Madurai - 625 007.

6. K.Subramani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take necessary action against the 6th respondent for the establishment of a Ind Plastic unit in Plot No.179, 1st New Street, Tagore Nagar, Thiruppalai, Madurai - 14 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 25.10.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For RR - 1, 3 & 4 : Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader For R - 2 : Mr.R.Murali For R - 6 : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate action against the sixth respondent from establishing a plastic unit in Plot No.179, 1st New Street, Tagore Nagar, Thiruppalai, Madurai by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the sixth respondent has represented to the effect that all the machineries put up by the sixth respondent have already been removed. 3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent has also vouchsafed the same.

4.Considering the aforesaid factual circumstances and also considering the fact that the sixth respondent has already removed all the machineries from the place mentioned in the petition, the relief sought in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 5.In fine, this Writ Petition is dismissed without cost. However, the second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner on 25.10.2016 with regard to alleged illegal construction and take appropriate action. Consequently, WMP(MD)Nos.17169 and 17170 of 2016 are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai-625 020.

2. The Member Secretary, Madurai Local Planning Authority, Aringnar Anna Maaligai, 3rd floor, Thallakulam, Madurai - 625 002.

3. The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Kappalur Industrial Estate, Madurai - 625 008. +1 cc to MR.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, ADVOCATE, SR NO: 13694 +1 cc to MR.T.Lajapathi Roy, ADVOCATE, SR NO: 13639 +1 cc to MR.R.Murali, ADVOCATE, SR NO: 14209 W.P(MD) No.23846 of 2016 09.03.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ mj MS-MR/16.3.2017/2P-7C