M.Ramaraj v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Ramaraj ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul 2.The Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry and dispose of the complaint by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthusamundeeswaran For Respondents : Mr. E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the respondent police have not conducted investigation on his complaint. 2.When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits based on the complaint of the petitioner, they have registered a case in Crime No.230 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2) and 118 (1) of BNS on 27.06.2025. 3.Recording the above submission this petition is closed. 30.06.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul 2.The Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 30.06.2025 4/4