← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/308/2025disposed of

Saravana Kumar v. State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By,

2025-06-27Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.86 of 2025 Saravana Kumar ... Petitioner versus

1. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Golden Rock Range, Trichy.

3. The Inspector of Police, Golden Rock Police Station, Trichy.

4. Kalimababu

5. Malaramannan

6. Sathyajothi ... Respondents 1/5

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 4th respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members by intervening into civil dispute related to O.S.No.210 of 2025 pending before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.06.2025 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Alagumani For R1 to R3 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner, with a grievance that the 4th respondent/Sub Inspector of Police, Golden Rock Police Station, Trichy, is interfering in a civil dispute and harassing him, has lodged a complaint dated 21.06.2025 before the 3rd respondent, namely, the Inspector of Police, Golden Rock Police Station, Trichy. Since the said complaint has not been enquired by the respondent Police, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2/5

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the complaint of the petitioner has been treated as petition enquiry in CSR No.115 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025 and the 3rd respondent is conducting the enquiry.

3. This Court considered the rival submissions made.

4. The main contention of the petitioner is that 4th respondent is interfering in a civil dispute and harassing him. In this regard, he lodged a complaint before the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent, instead of ascertaining the same, has treated the same as petition enquiry in CSR No.115 of 2025.

5. Therefore, the 2nd respondent/the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Golden Rock Range, Trichy, is directed to ascertain as to whether the 4th respondent is interfering in a civil dispute and advise the officials accordingly.

3/5

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.06.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Golden Rock Range, Trichy.

3. The Inspector of Police, Golden Rock Police Station, Trichy.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 27.06.2025 5/5