Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14852/2020allowed

Suresh v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-18Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.14852 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14852 of 2020 1.Suresh 2.Chandran @ Santhiran 3.Parameswari 4.Kuruvammal @ Guruvammal .. Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 4 Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

Crime No.7 of 2019 ..Respondent No.1/ Complainant 2.Shanmugapriya ..Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the FIR in Crime No.7 of 2019 under Sections 376, 417, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, dated 13.09.2019 on the file of the first respondent, Tirunelveli. For Petitioners : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.7 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.7 of 2019 pending on the file of the first respondent. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today (18.12.2020) and the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.14852 of 2020 complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.7 of 2019 pending on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

Encl: Xerox copy fo Joint Compromise Memo To

1) The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan,Advocate Sr.No.26556 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14852 of 2020 DATED : 18.12.2020 VB (24.02.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2