Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12814/2024closed

Perumalsamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

2024-08-07Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.08.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Perumalsamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Mamsapuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.Sundarraj 5.K.Alagarsamy 6.A.K.Karuppaiah ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 and not to interfere into civil dispute and thereby not to harass the petitioner based on the false complaint of 1/4

the respondents 4, 5 and 6 under the guise of enquiry and to pass such further orders on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner on 24.04.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 528 B.N.S.S., seeking orders to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere into civil dispute and thereby not to harass the petitioner based on the false complaint of the respondents 4, 5 and 6.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that 2 FIRs came to be registered in Crime No.126 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115 and 351(2) BNS and Crime No.127 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115, 133 and 351(2) BNS and investigation is pending and that the petitioner is not an accused.

2/4

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the third respondent at the instance of the private respondents is threatening the petitioner to give his consent for erecting name board in the community hall, which was constructed long back. But the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that they have not registered any FIR or CSR against the petitioner and never summoned the petitioner for enquiry.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 07.08.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No csm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

3/4

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

csm 3.The Inspector of Police, Mamsapuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Dated: 07.08.2024 4/4