Michael Selvan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
CRL MP(MD) No.9556 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL MP(MD) No.9556 of 2022 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12151 of 2022 1 MICHAEL SELVAN 2 MATHANKUMAR 3 ARUL SAMUVEL PANDIYAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUNNEERPALLAM POLICE STATION, MUNNEERPALLAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.128/2022) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to pass an order modifying the condition of reporting before the Respondent Police daily 10.30AM. by means of an order dt.6/7/2022 made Crl.OP(MD)No.12151/2022 by this Honble Court to the effect that, the petitioners have to report before the Court Concerned i.e., the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District or any other Learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli forthwith.
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM S, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.M.VAIKKAM KARUNANITHI, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in CRL.O.P.(MD)No.12151 of 2022, dated 06.07.2022.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.08.2022, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that even though the petitioner appeared before the respondent police, they did not permit him for signing in the records for compliance. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
CRL MP(MD) No.9556 of 2022 Therefore, this court directed the Station Officer to appear before this Court today.
3. The Station Officer present before this Court and submitted that even after issuing notice under Section 41(A), the petitioner is not co-operating for enquiry.
4. Since the wrong representation has been made by the petitioner as if the the respondents are not permitting, this petition is deserves to be dismissed.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
sd/- 01/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNEERPALLAM POLICE STATION, MUNEERPALLAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL MP(MD) No.9556 of 2022 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12151 of 2022 Date :01/09/2022 MK/SBN/SAR.IV/12.09.2022/2P/5C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2