← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10941/2025allowed

Barath v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2025-06-30Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/06/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI 1.Barath, S/o.Murugesan 2.Jafar, (Wrongly mentioned in FIR as Jabar) S/o.Saleemraja ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, PC Patti Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No.221 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.Vishnu V, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/6

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.221 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 & A2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 324, 303

(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.221 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and the de-facto complainant are part of the management of a school, namely Amaravathi Middle School. On 02.06.2025, based on a resolution passed by the school, one Saranya was appointed as the Principal of the said school. Thereafter, the 1st accused is said to have threatened the de-facto complainant to hand over the management of the school in his favour. Subsequently, on 10.06.2025, the accused is said to have entered the school, quarreled with the de-facto complainant, and demanded a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- for appointing the said Saranya as Principal. Hence, the present case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are 2/6

innocent persons and have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He, however, submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1 and A2 in this case. Due to the said incident, no one sustained any injuries, and no damage was caused to any property. He further submitted that there are no previous cases registered against the petitioners. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also taking note of the fact that due to the incident, no damage was caused to any property and no one sustained any injuries, and that there are no previous cases registered against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of 3/6

receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioners shall furnish their residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni. In the event of any change in their residential address, the petitioners shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni;

(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

4/6

(e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

sd/- 30/06/2025 / TRUE COPY / /07/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MKN 5/6

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THENI DISTRICT. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PC PATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10941 of 2025 Date :30/06/2025 PR/10.07 .2025 6P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 6/6