← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14353/2020ordered

Esakkimuthu v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-09Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/12/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

1. Esakkimuthu

2. Kandhasamy

3. Murugan ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

(Crime No.660/2020). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.KR.Bharathi Kannan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.660 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 448, 406 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.660 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners trespassed into the defacto complainant's premises and questioned him about the title of the property and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case has been registered. 1/3

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to civil dispute, the defacto complainant lodged a false compliant against the petitioners and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioners damaged the CCTV cameras and taken away the materials worth about Rs.2,59,000/-. He further submitted that it is a case and counter case.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that it is a case and counter case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) The petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 09/12/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, THOOTHUKUDI 2.DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIPCOT POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14353 of 2020 Date :09/12/2020 IAS PK/JC/SAR-IV/14.12.2020 : 3P/5C 3/3