Kannan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb

Crl.OP(MD).No.10959 of 2025 Crl.OP(MD).No.10959 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY , J.

This petition is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the intervener.

2.The learned counsel for the intervener submits that in the copy of the order dated 04.09.2025, the appearance of the learned counsel for the intervener has not been mentioned and his objection has not been recorded. 3.In view of the above submission, the appearance and his objection shall be incorporated in the order dated 04.09.2025 as follows: "For intervener: Mr.C.Ganeshkumar"

5.The learned counsel appearing for the intervener vehemently objected to granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners, since the accused abused the defacto complainant with filthy language, which affected his reputation.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP(MD).No.10959 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY , J.

vsg 4.Registry is directed to carry-out the necessary corrections and number the following paragraphs consecutively, in the order dated 04.09.2025 in Crl.OP(MD).No.10959 of 2025 and issue fresh order copy to the learned counsel for the parties.

25.09.2025 vsg Crl.OP(MD).No.10959 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis