M.Mohan, v. Mr.Ponmudi,The Managing Director

Contempt Petition(MD).Nos.1131, 1133 and 1139 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Contempt Petition(MD).Nos.1131, 1133 and 1139 of 2019 in Writ Petition (MD).Nos.21910, 21909 and 21908 of 2018 M.Mohan .. Petitioner/Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD).No.1131/2019 S.Rajendran .. Petitioner/Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD).No.1133/2019 J.Santhanam .. Petitioner/Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD).No.1139/2019 Vs.

1.Ponmudi, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

....1st Respondent/Contemnor (in all Cases) 2.Anusham, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam Region, Kumbakonam. ...2nd Respondent/Contemnor (in Cont P(MD)No.1133 of 2019) 3.Anusham, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd, Nagapattinam Region, Nagapattinam.

...3rd Respondent/Contemnor (in Cont P(MD)No.1131 & 1139 of 2019) 4.Venkadarajan, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-02.

.. 3rd Respondent/Contemnors in all cases Common Prayer: Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents/contemnors for willfully disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD). Nos.21910, 21909 and 21908 of 2018 dated 26.10.2018. Prayer in WP(MD). 21908,21909,21910 of 2018 : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Contempt Petition(MD).Nos.1131, 1133 and 1139 of 2019 the respondents 1 and 2 to revise petitioner's pay and grade pay in terms of Clause 1(a) and Clause 5 of settlement under Section 12(3) of the I.D Act dated 04.01.2018 and consequently direct the respondents to revise their pension, gratuity, earned leave salary, commuted value of pension, provident fund based on the pay revision given in the settlement and to disburse the difference amounts in the terminal benefits together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from the date when it became due till the date of actual payment within the time limit that may be fixed by this court.

In all cases:

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman For R1 and R2 Mr.A.Swaminathan for R3 COMMON ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Recording the submission, these contempt petitions are closed. If the petitioners have got any grievance, ie., in case lesser amount is paid to them, it is open to them to agitate the same in the manner known to law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PJL +1 CC to Mr.D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-21534[F] dated 09/11/2020 ) Cont.P.(MD).Nos.1131, 1133 and 1139 of 2019 in W.P.(MD).Nos.21910, 21909 and 21908 of 2018 06.11.2020 VB (26.11.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2