Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18028/2019disposed of

M.Suyamburaja v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-08-21Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18028 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.18028 of 2019 M.Suyamburaja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Arumuganeri, Tuticorin District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order vide his proceedings Nil, dated- Nil passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequentially direct the second respondent to permit the petitioner to conduct Innisai Katcheri Programme scheduled to be held on 29.08.2019 and Aadal Padal Programme schedule to be held on 30.08.2019 in connection with the Kodai Thiruvizha Celebration of Arulmigu Utchini Mahali Amman Temple situated at Bye pass Road, Kayalpattinam, Tuticorin District. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the order dated Nil passed by the second respondent and consequently to direct the second respondent to permit the petitioner to conduct Innisai Katcheri Programme scheduled to be held on 29.08.2019 and Aadal Padal Programme schedule to be held on 30.08.2019 in connection with the Kodai Thiruvizha Celebration of Arulmigu Utchini Mahali Amman Temple situated at Bye pass Road, Kayalpattinam, Tuticorin District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18028 of 2019

2. Heard both sides.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that seeking permission and protection to conduct Innisai Katcheri Programme on 29.08.2019 and Aadal Padal Programme on 30.08.2019 in the above said temple, the petitioner made a representation on 09.08.2019 and the said request was rejected by the second respondent on the ground that there is a likelihood of law and order problem. Challenging the said order, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

4. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that now the respondent police is willing to consider the request of the petitioner.

5. In the above circumstances, since the respondent police is willing to consider the request of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the second respondent. On making such representation, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law, forthwith.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Arumuganeri, Tuticorin District.

+1 CC to M/s.V.MALAIYENDRAN, Advocate ( SR-82708[F] dated 21/08/2019) W.P.(MD)No.18028 of 2019 21.08.2019 TA JM/28.08.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2