← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18317/2020dismissed

R. Balasubramanian v. The Superintendent Of Police

2024-02-13Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.02.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.(MD)No.18317 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15301 and 15302 of 2020 R.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Thoothukudi - 2.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Police Station, Thoothukudi.

3.The Social Security Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Southern Regional Office, Tirunelveli.

... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 3rd Respondent from making any visit to petitioner's business unit namely M/s.Shriram Engineering situated at

Thoothukudi in pursuance of the visit notice dated 27.11.2020 issued by their office forthwith by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.12.2020. For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.D.Sasikumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.N.Dilipkumar for R3

O R D E R

This matter came up for consideration Yesterday. As there was no representation for the petitioner, the same was directed to be listed under the caption 'For dismissal'. Today, in spite of the matter being listed under the caption 'For dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. Further, from the perusal of the relief sought in the Writ Petition, it is noticed that the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to restrain the third

respondent from making any visit to the business unit of the petitioner situated at Thoothukudi in pursuance of the visit notice dated 27.11.2020 and to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.12.2020.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the third respondent that pursuant to the impugned notice, the visit could not take place on 27.11.2020 and subsequently it was taken place on 10.12.2020. The visit was already over in the premises of the petitioner and thus the relief has become infructuous.

4. In the light of the above, for want of proper prosecution and also on the ground that the relief has become infructuous, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

13.02.2024 Index :

Yes / No vsm MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

vsm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Thoothukudi - 2.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Police Station, Thoothukudi.

3.The Social Security Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Southern Regional Office, Tirunelveli.

W.P.(MD)No.18317 of 2020

13.02.2024