Karthiga v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26.07.2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble MR.JUSTICE AA.NAKKIRAN Karthiga ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

(In Crime No.318 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manojkumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticpatory Bail in Crime No.318 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 3(2)a, 4(1), 4(2)(b), 5(1)(a), 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention)Act, 1956 in Cr.No.318 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons, in the name of Spa, have conducted prostitution. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) for the respondent submits that the petitioner is not having any previous case pending as against her. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the 2/4

learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Tirunelveli on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 am., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 3/4

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 26/07/2024 / TRUE COPY / / 08 /2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GNS TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I, TIRUNELVELI.

2. DO-THROUGH, THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11654 of 2024 Date :26/07/2024 PSP/VR/SAR /09.08.2024/ 4P/ 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4