Vignesh v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/12/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN M.Vignesh ...Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
Crime No.1088 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabu, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.1088 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.10.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307, 324 and 506 (ii) of IPC on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant, assaulted him and also threatened with dire consequences.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He would also submit that the injured was already discharged from the hospital.
4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that due to previous enmity the petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant, assaulted him and also threatened with dire consequences and the injured was also discharged from the hospital. 1/3
5. Taking note of the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration and also taking note of the fact that the injured was already discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two blood sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II,Kovilpatti i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.
30 a.m and 5.30 pm., for a period of four weeks. iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness. iv) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial. v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 10/12/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
2/3
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.II, KOVILPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILPATTI WEST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
4.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI.
5.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.14445 of 2020 Date :10/12/2020 AAV TK/SMA/SAR.3/10.12.2020/3P/6C 3/3