← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7708/2018withdrawn dismissed

Dindigul Promotors Private Ltd v. The Union Of India

2020-11-24Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7323 and 7324 of 2018 W.P.(MD)No.7708 of 2018 Dindigul Promoters Private Ltd., (Struck off) No.19/4-448-1, Dinesh Niwas, Gaandhi Nagar, Dindigul - 624 001, Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Director K.Thangaraj ... Petitioner -vs1.The Union of India, Rep. by Assistant Director (Policy), ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent herein to consider the statutory notice dated 14.02.2018 issued by the petitioner under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act and initiate necessary action under Section 248(4) of the Companies Act and consequently direct the third respondent to delete the petitioner company for "strike off" made under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act.

1/3

W.P.(MD)No.7709 of 2018 Trichy Packaged Milk Private Ltd., (Struck off) No.2/52, "Raaj Kudil", Pillaiyarnatham, Pithalaipatti Post, Dindigul - 624 002, Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Director R.Rajasekaran ... Petitioner -vs1.The Union of India, Rep. By Assistant Director (Policy), ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent herein to consider the statutory notice dated 12.02.2018 issued by the petitioner under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act and initiate necessary action under Section 248(4) of the Companies Act and consequently direct the third respondent to delete the petitioner company for "strike off" made under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Janakiramulu in both cases For Respondent 1 : Mrs.S.Srimathy in both cases COMMON ORDER When these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner through video conference sought permission of this Court to withdraw these Writ Petitions. 2/3

2.Permission is granted. Both the Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (crl side) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) SRM To 1.The Assistant Director (Policy), Union of India, W.P(MD)Nos.7708 and 7709 of 2018 24.11.2020 VB (11.12.2020) 3P 4C 3/3