Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11585/2019dismissed

A. Parameswaran v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-08-28Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.11585 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/08/2019 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.11585 of 2019

1. A.Parameswaran

2. Ayyappan

3. Parasakthi

4. A.Paneerselvam

5. A.Neelamegam

6. A.Sivarajan

7. Sivasakthi ... Petitioners/Accused Rank not known Vs The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Theni District (Crime No.20 of 2019). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: M/s. R. Maheswaran, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anantha Devi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. of 2019 on the file of the respondent.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police has submitted that during the pendency of this petition, First Information Report has been registered in Crime No.20 of 2019 under Sections 9 and 10 of Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 and Section 6 of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, against the first petitioner and two others namely Chinraj and Panjavarnam. She further submitted that the first petitioner has been arrested by the respondent police and remanded https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.11585 of 2019 to judicial custody and in so far as other petitioners are concerned, they are not arrayed as accused in the FIR and therefore, she prayed to dismiss the petition.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has fairly conceded that after registering the FIR, the first petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody and in so far as other petitioners are concerned, they were not arrayed as accused. 3.A perusal of the FIR shows that the FIR has been registered against the first petitioner and two others namely Chinraj and Panjavarnam. Since the first petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody, this criminal original petition has become infructuous. Hence, in so far as the first petitioner is concerned, this Criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. In so far as other petitioners are concerned, they are not arrayed as accused. Therefore, this criminal original petition is dismissed in respect of the other petitioners also. sd/- 28/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT 2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S. R.MAHESWARAN Advocate SR.No.14259

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11585 of 2019 Date :28/08/2019 VSG PK/JC/SAR-1/04.09.2019 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2