P. John Thomas (Died) 1. Glory v. Ramasamy Mooppanar
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-06-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI in SA(MD) NO. 568 of 2012 P.John Thomas (Died) 1.Glory 2.Josephinrajam (Died) 3.Lilli Michael Rani 4.Sahaya Jeyanthi 5.Mary Daisy Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.Ramasamy Mooppanar 2.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Palayamkottai, Rep. by its Superintending Engineer.
3.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Courtralam, 1/5
Rep. by its Junior Engineer (Village).
Murugaiah (Died) 4.Ramakrishnan @ Chellappa 5.Arumugam 6.Thirumalaikumar Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions :
Mr.D.Srinivasaragavan, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions :
Mr.R.Manimaran, Advocate for R1 Mr.B.Ramanathan, Standing Counsel for R3 M/s.Lakshmi Gopinathan for M/s.Polex Legal Solutions for R4 R2, R5, & R6 - No Appearance Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, Order XXII Rule 9, and Order XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to condone the delay of 840 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant, to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant, and to bring on record petitioners 1 to 5 herein as the legal representatives of 2/5
the deceased sole appellant, namely P.John Thomas, and rank them as appellants 2 to 6 in S.A.(MD)No.568 of 2012 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have ben filed to condone the delay of 840 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant, to set aside the abatement of the above Second Appeal caused due to the death of the sole Appellant, and to bring on record petitioners 1 to 5 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant, namely P.John Thomas, and rank them as appellants 2 to 6 in S.A.(MD)No.568 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions.
3. There is no representation for the 2nd respondent. 3/5
4. The names of respondents 5 & 6 have been printed in the cause list.
5. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent have not raised any serious objections to these petitions.
6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.
17-06-2026 (1/2) Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum.
mkn 4/5
P.VADAMALAI, J.
mkn in SA(MD) NO. 568 of 2012 17.06.2026 (1/2) 5/5