Prasath @ Thoms Anthony Kurus, v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dindigul Taluk

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11021 of 2026 1.Prasath @ Thomas Anthony Kurus 2.Surjith ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.337 of 2026)

...Respondents/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karuna Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 337 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 329(4), 287, 326, 324(4), 1/4

351(3) of BNS , in Crime No.337 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the offences involved in this case are bailable offences. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court.

3.This Court also perused the records. As per the FIR the the case was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 329(4), 287, 326, 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS. All the above said offences are bailable in nature. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court. 4.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. (P D B J) 15.06.2026 TM To 1.TheJudicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul.

2/4

2.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11021 of 2026 Date : 15.06.2026 4/4