Muthulakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Alangudi All Women Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

(Crime No.3 of 2023).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :

Ms.E.L.Shalini, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.3 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C, in Crime No.3 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks 1/4

anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was married to the first accused in 2010. After that they begotten two children. But however, the first accused namely husband developed illegal intimacy with the second accused, that was witnessed by the defacto complainant directly, when that was objected and enquired by her, she was abused and harassed. On 15.06.2023, in a drunken mode, the first accused came to the house, pored kerosene on the defacto complainant and she was immediately taken to the hospital, where she was admitted for three days. After that the present complaint has been registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after three days of the occurrence, the above said complaint has been given. The petitioner is an innocent an there is dispute pending between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Due to vengeance, the defacto complainant made a false complaint against the petitioner before the respondent Police.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the bruttal attack has been made upon the defacto complainant. Hence, he makes serious objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the grievous allegations made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant 2/4

anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this anticipatory bail petition deserves dismissal and accordingly dismissed.

sd/- 12/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / /08/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGUDI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12674 of 2023 Date :12/07/2023 PKP/MR/SAR-(09.08.2023) 3P 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/4

4/4