Geetha Maahalakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15584 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15584 of 2020 1)Geetha Mahalakshmi 2)Prabakaran 3)Prasanna Venkatesh 4)Rajasankaramoorthy : Petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 vs.

1)The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Theni District.

[Ref.Cr.No.40/2012) : 1st Respondent/Complainant 2)S.M.Veeraraj : 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.10/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Land Grabbing cases, Theni and quash the same and all further proceedings.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.10/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Land Grabbing cases, Theni. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.10 of 2016.

3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15584 of 2020 Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.10/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Land Grabbing cases, Theni, are quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.S) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) bala Enclose: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo. Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned. To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Land Grabbing cases, Theni 2)The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Theni District.

3)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15584 of 2020 DATED : 23.12.2020 MJ(CO) CS(19.01.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2