R.Vijayaraman, v. Shobana,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and CRL.M.P.(MD).Nos.970 & 971 of 2018 1.R.Vijayaraman 2.V.Rajeshwari 3.M.Thangavel ... Petitioners/Respondent Nos.2 to 4 Vs.
Shobana
...Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records and quash the complaint filed in D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
For Petitioners : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.S.Prabhu
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in D.V.O.P.No. 12 of 2017 filed by the respondent herein, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam.
2.The petitioners are in-laws of the respondent and the marriage between R1/Gokulakrishnan and the respondent Viz.,Shobana was solemnized on 06.05.2011. Thereafter, due to matrimonial disputes the respondent and her husband were living separately from the matrimonial home. Under this circumstance, the respondent herein filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and implicated the petitioners as parties to the petition and sought action as against them under Domestic Violence Act. The said D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017 is pending for trial. At this stage, the petitioners herein who are the in-laws of the respondent pray to quash the proceedings in D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
1/3
4.It is seen that the relief sought for by the respondent in the domestic violence case with regard to residential rights, compensation, etc., can be made and claimed as against her husband, who is already a party in that case. The petitioners herein are only in-laws of the respondent and they are living separately. As such, the protection order sought for by the respondent herein in the domestic violence case against these petitioners/ in-laws, based on the allegations, cannot be maintained, in view of the fact that the allegations of harassment meted out by the petitioners against the respondent itself seems to be false. While that being so, there cannot be any act of any domestic violence as defined under Domestic Violence Act against these petitioners. In the absence of the same, the proceedings as against these petitioners cannot be maintained and consequently, the petitioners need not undergo the ordeal of facing a criminal trial.
5.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to quash the proceedings in D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam, insofar as these petitioners are concerned, on condition that, they shall ensure that the R1/husband of the respondent shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) before 5th of every English Calendar month to the credit of D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam, as ad-interim maintenance, without prejudice to both the parties, failing which this order shall stand automatically cancelled. On such deposit being made, the respondent herein is entitled to withdraw the same.
6. Insofar as R1/husband of the respondent is concerned, since the impugned proceedings in D.V.O.P.No.12 of 2017 is of the year 2017, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. A1/husband of the respondent is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next hearing date, failing which, the respondent is at liberty to approach this Court. 7.
In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM 2/3
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-86010[F] dated 09/09/2019 ) and CRL.M.P.(MD).Nos.970 & 971 of 2018 06.09.2019 msa JM/30.09.2019/3P/4C 3/3