Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2635/2018dismissed

Arumugam @ Arumugathai v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-10-18Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2635 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.10.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2635 of 2018 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1208 of 2018 Arumugam @ Arumugathai : Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(FIR in Crime No.353/2017) : Respondents 1 & 2/Complainants 3.Miss.Gandhi : 3rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining and to quash the FIR in Crime NO.353 of 2017 dated 22.11.2017 registered on the file of the second respondent police under the alleged Section 294 (b), 354 (c) 506 (i) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002. For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthick

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.353 of 2017 dated 22.11.2017 registered on the file of the second respondent police.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2635 of 2018 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that even after passing the order by this Court, the respondent police has not filed a final report. Hence, the petitioner filed a contempt petition as against the second respondent police and the same is pending.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the respondent police completed investigation in Crime No. 353 of 2017 and also filed final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.III, Tirunelveli.

5. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) dss To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli. +1 CC to M/s.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate SR-93175. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2635 of 2018 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1208 of 2018 18.10.2019 CS(06.11.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2